The Loch Ness Monster

Official Story:

The Loch Ness Monster is a Gaelic, legend of a very large water creature that inhabits the Southern Highlands. There isnt any evidence of this creature existing, as it is a legend its only known through folklore.

 

The Loch Ness Monster conspiracy really picked up pace, and was brought to increased international attention when sightings of the creature began to be reported. The creature is to be described by many as looking like a Plesiosaurus.

What happened?

People taking photos and eye-witness accounts, raised an interest in the legendary creature and researchers have conducted research and expeditions to see if the claims are real. According to researchers there isn't any evidence to support the claims, and many scientists have decreditted the photos, pointing out that they are other marine life in the water, branches or just shadows on the water. This legend has created something from folklore to a scientific and tourist attratcion. Although there are still people who swear they have seen 'Nessie' the nickname of the creature, whether they are right is another thing. There have been hocuses surrounding the Loch Ness Monster where people have created footprints or very persuasive images of the creature. This has only increased the conspiracy around the legend.

Eye Witness Accounts:

Mr George MacBean and Others 1934 An object at first thought to be debris, but moving against the wind.

Mr J McKillop 1947 A single hump seen at great range travelling at speed.

Lady Maud Baillie 1950 A single hump, at first thought to be a rock, made off at speed.

Col. P Grant 1951 A single hump about 6 feet (1.8m) long moving very fast.

Dr Synge 1952 Observed from and followed by a car, a single hump about 440 yards (400m) from shore. It then stopped and submerged.

Mr John Cameron 1967 A hump like an upturned boat just a few yards (metres) from him. It was about 12 feet (3.7m) long. It should be noted that this is the most common type of sighting at Loch Ness, but somewhat overshadowed by the less believable dinosaur-type sightings.

Mrs D Fraser 1967 A very large single hump which came up, moved rapidly and then submerged leaving a large wake. Mrs Fraser described it as like the back of a giant tortoise.

Dr & Mrs Rines plus Mr & Mrs Cary 1971 The four observed a single hump 20 feet ( 6m) long at a range of three quarters of a mile (1,200m). They examined it through a telescope from the Cary's cottage just above Urquhart Castle. Dr Rines described it as having a back like that of an elephant. Mrs Cary later said that it could have been anything. The late Carol Rines had also seen the monster previously when she first arrived at the loch. When the taxi driver pointed the monster out to her she told him not to stop as she wanted to get to the house and she would have many opportunities to see it once she had settled in. Obviously the sighting with the Cary's proves she was right. In 1972 Mrs Cary dowsed for the best position for Dr Rines to place his underwater cameras. Her skill is proven (TIC) by the almost immediate success of the flipper pictures.

 

Tony Harmsworth 1986 While leaving his house he spotted something in the water about 400 metres or so away and moving diagonally across the loch against the direction of the wind. Through binoculars it was clearly an elongated shape he estimated at between four and six feet long (1.2 to 1.9m). Later comparisons with a boat in the same location showed that the object was closer to four than six feet long demonstrating that even people living overlooking the loch and seeing something from their own house can make mistakes over size of objects in water. For information, a seal is about two feet or 600mm long at the surface showing that four feet, 1,200mm, is quite a substantial object.

 

 

My opinion:

I would love to believe that Nessie is really having been there myself, I didn't see anything, but as a kid growing up the legend was very interesting, and was constantly being used in kids shows. So the legend has a special place in my heart, I wish it was true, but I doubt it, because the scientific evidence is to strong, against the Loch Ness Monster existing, especially when there isn't any evidence at all to prove the existance of Nessie.

References to other pages:
http://www.nessie.co.uk/
http://www.unmuseum.org/lochness.htm
http://www.loch-ness.com/eyewitnesses.html

MK ULTRA Project

Official Story?

In the early 1950's the US Government developed a project called 'MK ULTRA PROJECT' the program ran until the early 70's. The program was carried out by the CIA, aimed at researching and developing a mind control and behavioural alterating drug or therapy in which to control people. One of there main objectives was to prevent their own soldiers and spies being controlled themselves, so they believed if they figured out how to control them first then they could train them not to be controlled. This came after a time of the threat of Communism, and after the Cold War, Russia was one of their main concerns, in who were trying to accordig to the US Government, develop similar techniques in mind control.

What happened?

The CIA implemented human testing on, civilians, their own agents, and prisoners, many of the patients consisted of the 'weaker' and 'volunnerable' of society, mental illness patients, prostitutes, and the homeless, were jsut some of the many groups of society that the CIA used. The testing carried out was mainly drug testing using LSD, other torture techniques were used like, electroshock therapy, and other more unstable drugs. This include administering the drugs over a period of time to watch the affects, it also involved placing people in situations to see how the drug affects reacted. In an attempt to understand the affects to then use them in to control people.

The following is an outline of what some of the objectives were, and the means in which to test them:

• Substances which will promote illogical thinking and impulsiveness to the point where the recipient would be discredited in public.
• Substances which increase the efficiency of mentation and perception.
• Materials which will cause the victim to age faster/slower in maturity.
• Materials which will promote the intoxicating effect of alcohol.
• Materials which will produce the signs and symptoms of recognized diseases in a reversible way so that they may be used for malingering, etc.
• Materials will cause temporary/permanent brain damage and loss of memory.
• Substances which will enhance the ability of individuals to withstand privation, torture and coercion during interrogation and so-called "brain-washing".
• Materials and physical methods which will produce amnesia for events preceding and during their use.
• Physical methods of producing shock and confusion over extended periods of time and capable of surreptitious use.
• Substances which produce physical disablement such as paralysis of the legs, acute anemia, etc.
• Substances which will produce a chemical that can cause blisters.
• Substances which alter personality structure in such a way that the tendency of the recipient to become dependent upon another person is enhanced.
• A material which will cause mental confusion of such a type that the individual under its influence will find it difficult to maintain a fabrication under questioning.
• Substances which will lower the ambition and general working efficiency of men when administered in undetectable amounts.
• Substances which promote weakness or distortion of the eyesight or hearing faculties, preferably without permanent effects.
• A knockout pill which can surreptitiously be administered in drinks, food, cigarettes, as an aerosol, etc., which will be safe to use, provide a maximum of amnesia, and be suitable for use by agent types on an ad hoc basis.
• A material which can be surreptitiously administered by the above routes and which in very small amounts will make it impossible for a person to perform physical activity.

Surrounding Conspiracies?

The US Government, commissioned an iquiry for this project after it deceased in the early 1970's. The inquiry concluded that the MK ULTRA project had occurred, as many people had suspicion but no real conclusive evidence to prove its existance. Many people have claimed to have been subjects in the testing, and as a result a few legal cases have been won, to people suing for compensation for the damages and experiences they were unwillingly put through. The conspiracies mainlly focus on who, and by who the experiments were performed. Some deaths did occur from the experiments, their circumstances are very shady and hardly spoken about. Although official documents detail the experiments, according to diaries of some of the Doctors and Agents that performed the experiments, the exact details and amounts of things administered weren't always correcty documented. The real question from this conspiracy theory is who was effected, and how? Are they telling the truth or not? What deaths and illness were enhanced or encouraged by the effects of the experimentation? Will we really know the truth behind what actually went on during the MK ULTRA PROJECT?

My Opinion?

Without a doubt I believe that these experiments occurred and were far more extreme then the US iquiry lead on. When the threat of Communism was there, whilst just coming out of the Cold War of course the US Government tried to do do anything possible to get ahead of the world. The US Government has a record of not releasing information or at least all the details of other incidents and projects so why would this project be any different? Regardless of the inquiry that was commissioned by the same Government that provided the 10 million dollar funding to the CIA to conduct the testing, why would they not tell the whole truth, its not in their interest to.

Ref:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MK_Ultra
http://science.discovery.com/stories/mkultra-02.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20071128230208/http://www.arts.rpi.edu/~pellr/lansberry/mkultra.pdf

The Illuminati

The Illuminati and one of the other conspiracies investigated - the New World Order - are interconnected.
This post is to be focused on what the Illuminati is, who is in it and its plausibility.

It is extremely difficult to give concrete evidence which proves there is such a group as the Illuminati - a deep suspicion and critique of current society is required to understand other parts of our current society that may prove their is this elusive group.

What is the Illuminati?

 

In modern society, it is refers to the supposed 'real world government' that essentially runs the world. It is a secretive society of some of the most influential individuals in the world who are generally members and leaders of governments or senior officials in large corporations.

The term 'Illuminati' is derived from the Bavarian Illuminati who did exist and during the Enlightenment era which was formed by Jesuit Adam Weishaupt. They were intent on progressing society - but in their own, distorted, fashion.

It is suggested elements of the Illuminati survived laws from the monarchy that banned societies not sanctioned by the King.

This is believed to be the modern Illuminati. They supposedly have a some special or superior knowledge that they feel makes them the elite of society.

What do they do?

Control everything. They aim to make money and control all the important political decisions of the world in an attempt to better themselves - generally materialistically.

Following is a list of the things that may be aspects controlled by the Illuminati:

• Religion: convincing huge amounts of people to follow certain beliefs is the perfect tool for control for a world government. Different religions also grant the ability to help cause tensions and generate reasons for war - to target certain things that do not fit in with the plan.
• Wars: there is evidence to suggest that bankers helped support World War I through sending money and resources to neutral countries which indirectly made its way to Germany and are allegedly attempting to generate a World War 3 to take control of world oil supplies
• Banking and Money: the Illuminati symbol of the pyramid and the eye is features on the American dollar and the corrupt system of banking which toys with people's income and savings to the benefit of the advantaged

The video below goes into more depth about how the Illuminati are (or are going to) attain greater power.

Members of the Illuminati

There is supposedly a committee of 300 people who are apart of this elite group - the full list (as of September 2010) is in the links below.
Most notable of these include:

• Queen Elizabeth II (the leader)
• Tony Blair - former leader of the UK
• Warren Buffet - billionaire and philanthropist
• Mikhail Gorbachev - former USSR leader
• Rupert Murdoch - media magnate
• Nicolas Sarkozy - then current leader of the French republic

These various people are neither confirmed or denied - as no official or formal list of the Illuminati is known.

 

Conclusion

We can not possibly know or understand this possible Illuminati group exists. I am personally unsure about the presence of an Illuminati. More evidence is required and proof is needed to be validated. If it is being hidden it needs to be published to enlighten the rest of society.
Believing in the Illuminati with our current knowledge is like an ideology in that it helps explain the world affairs and help us to understand what is going on. In much the same way as the Abrahamic religions see God as the controller of all things - it is possible to understand our current society by viewing world events as being controlled by the Illuminati.
Until we uncover more evidence - this conspiracy remains hidden behind the veil of mystery.

Are the Illuminati real? Are they just greedy? Or do they have more sinister motives in mind?
(Please let us know  your thoughts in the comment section below)

References

- http://www.illuminati-news.com/index.htm
- http://socioecohistory.wordpress.com/2012/04/23/current-membership-list-of-the-illuminati-committee-of-300/
- http://one-evil.org/entities_organizations/evil_org_illuminati.htm

The 'Terrorist Attacks' of 9/11

Before starting - I want to acknowledge that the deaths that resulted from the actions on 9/11 were real.
Our cause is to bring to the light the conspiracy (and for many, the hidden truth) surrounding that fateful day.

Now - the official story goes something like this:

According the US government; on the morning of 9/11, 19 hijackers - under the authority of Osama Bin Laden and on a holy mission against the United states - took control of 4 commercial airliners. Two of them hit the two World Trade Centre towers, one was flown into the Pentagon, and the last one was wrestled back by the passengers and flew into the forest.
*Also of note, is that the WTC building 7 was also destroyed by a fire that was supposedly started as a result of shrapnel from the other two

Now for the elements of the conspiracy theories that question the official story.

Collapse of the Twin Towers

Pancake Theory

Buildings that have plans flown into them do not fall straight down. Engineers and architects across the world have questioned how a plane that hits close to the top of the tower, results in the collapse of an entire skyscraper. If they had fallen in a 'pancake' fashion, there would have been concrete and rubble all around - instead we were left with dust.

The following is footage of WTC Tower 1 falling down:

Take note of the vast amount of dust and smoke that erupts from all sides as they collapse.

The following is a controlled implosion at Fort Worth (skipping to 0:30 will take you to a few seconds before it begins):

This controlled demolition looks rather like the tower falling down - does it not?

Hotspots
There is also documentation indicating that there were hotspots in the rubble of the towers - hotspots that were far greater the temperature than that of the temperatures generated when burning jet fuel.

So with this in mind - what could possibly have caused the collapse of the towers?
Explosives.

-----

The most suggested explosive used is 'thermite' as it could have disintegrated the concrete and all the office materials inside, generated the temperatures uncovered in the rubble and would also explain the metallic substances that were found in the rubble.

Having this amount of proof indicates that the Twin Towers were brought down using controlled demolition.

But terrorists couldn't possibly have enough access to the two towers to plant all these explosives you say?

Correct!

Who else had enough access to the WTC towers to plant the explosives?

The Pentagon

 

Following the 'plane' flying into the Pentagon, the evidence was cleared up at a quick pace. FBI agents scoured the area collecting debris - not making details which could have helped with the investigation.

It is also rather convenient that the 'terrorists' flew the plane into a part of the Pentagon which was under renovation. Rather than fly it into one of the more important sections such as the the office of Donald Rumsfield, the Secretary of Defence, who was safe on the other side of the building.

The only footage of the alleged plane flying into the Pentagon was two security cameras which do not clearly show the plane at all. The other footage that would have shown the plane was collected from nearby buildings and petrol stations.

Leaked footage suggests that there was possibly a missile rather than a plane - which would fit in with the fact that the hole made by the 'plane' was much smaller than what should have occurred.

The questions of what caused the damage - and why was an almost empty section of the Pentagon targeted; raise suspicions and cover the attack on the Pentagon under a cloak of mystery.

World Trade Centre Building 7

The WTC Building 7 fell in much the same way as the Twin Towers - only it didn't have a plane flown into it. Supposedly, debris is said to have flown off from the initial hit on the towers. However, building 7 is separated from the towers by building 6.

There was indeed fires on some of the lower levels of the building. However, this does not explain how the penthouse fell first - followed by the rest of the building; like the WTC - into itself.

Puffs of dust were also seen as in the controlled demolition of the Twin Towers.

Again - as seen in the towers, the steel was destroyed. No steel structure has ever collapsed as a result of fire. The steel would needed to be heated to around 800 degrees celcius and even then, there would still be many remnants of the steel amongst the rubble.
There wasn't

So WTC Building 7 was also brought down by demolition - who has such access to the other WTC buildings?

Flight 93 - Crashed or Shot?

The official story says that the plane was hijacked - and then passengers fought back to take over the controls. In doing so, the plane crashed down into a rural area in a strip mine.

However, there is much evidence to suggest that the plane was shot down.

Eyewitnesses indicate they saw a jet chasing the plane, that weird engine noises were heard and that the plane dropped vertically soon after.

These are all consistent with the notion that the plane was intercepted by a jet. What reinforces this notion is that debris was found miles away from the crash site. If the plane had been commandeered by the passengers and then crashed - why would there be debris in places miles away from the main crash site?

Other Discrepancies

Following is a simple list of other facts that should send warning signals to those who believe the official story.

• The hijacked flights took long winded routes - exposing them to possible interception (which was highly possible)
• A paper trail of great length was uncovered within hours of the attacks - but the 'terrorists' supposedly eluded all authorities for years
• The FBI 'found' a passport from one of the planes that flew into the towers, quite remarkable considering that all that remained of the plane was a few landing gear fragments
• Several hijackers were found alive after the attack - and the information put out by the FBI matched their personal details
• The fanatical Muslim hijackers supposedly ventured into strip clubs using credit cards - despite their religion (which they 'followed to the death') not allowing such action
• The video of Osama Bin Laden confessing to the attacks does not look like him when compared to videos where it is known that it is him

Conclusion

The collapse of the WTC Twin Towers and Building 7 were, without a doubt, brought down by explosives. The attack on the Pentagon is shrouded in mystery which screams cover-up. The holes in the story of Flight 93 are huge and question the accuracy of the entire stories Once accepting this fact there is three possibilities - it was either the:

• the most well-planned, clever, accurate and devastating terrorist act ever committed by Islamic terrorist groups
• OR
• the most well-planned, clever, accurate and devastating act of state terrorism carried out by the US government
• OR
• a more secretive act by powerful and unknown forces - perhaps a New World Order, the Illuminati or money-hungry corporations

You decide: crafty terrorists, power-hungry government or secretive forces beyond our knowledge.

As mentioned earlier - regardless of who caused this, senseless, tragic, horrifying event changed the course of history.
(Please feel free to comment below)

References

Detailed Conspiracy Facts and Figures: http://911research.wtc7.net/ (Highly recommended for anyone who wishes to explore further)

The Zeitgeist 9/11 Videos:
-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EIB6z4fkINs
-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zK4C-1BP9Zw&feature=relmfu
-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AP8Fokrv8Dk&feature=relmfu
-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5kjLQAm5pU

Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth: http://www.ae911truth.org/en/home.html

Government Commission into 9/11: http://www.9-11commission.gov/

The Beginning:

Conspiracies

Do you believe in conspiracies?

 

Do conspiracies have any truth to them?

 

Do they make you think just a little bit longer?

 

Do they make you question what you have been told or seen?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lets see shall we and then you can be the judge?

 

 

 

 

We will provide you with the evidence about some of the world's most famous conspiracies and the theories behind them, in an attempt to uncover the truth.

 

 

 

 

9/11

illuminati 
Atlantis 

Ancient Aliens

Big Foot

The Moon Landing

Freemasons

Loch Ness

The Gun powder Plot

Project MKULTRA

Area 51

Wingdings

The Bermuda Triangle

Stonehenge

New World Order

 

 

 

 

 

Are you ready to know the truth?